Hmm...I see both your points of view here but Logio...how many things have science accepted without necessarily having them fully proved?
How many things are called...'syndromes' as they cannot explain the reason for a particular function of a dis-ease etc?
The brain is the last great frontier to explore and due to its nature of people needing them to function, can be very hard to map and yet they have done this process to some extent...but if its the greatest computer and it is widely accepted that approximately (and being generous here) that only 30-40% is being used...what is the rest for?
I think sometimes, science will forego its imperical proof in favour of what is generally accepted.
Good thought provoking thread....
HUGS
Bookmarks